Abstract :
This paper explores a rich array of sociological theories that collectively offer lenses through which the intricate dynamics of human society can be comprehended. At the heart of sociological inquiry lies a diverse array of theoretical frameworks that have shaped the discipline and continue to inform research and analysis. From Functionalist perspectives that view society as a system of interdependent parts to Critical Theory, which critiques societal structures and aims to foster social justice, these theories provide distinct insights into societal structures, power dynamics, and human behaviour. The journey through these frameworks elucidates their individual contributions, from Functionalism’s emphasis on societal equilibrium to Conflict Theory’s scrutiny of power differentials. Symbolic Interactionism sheds light on the micro-level dynamics of social interaction, while Feminist Theory advocates for the eradication of gender-based disparities. Structuralism explores the influence of societal structures, Rational Choice Theory delves into individual decision-making, and Social Exchange Theory examines give-and-take dynamics within relationships. Phenomenology challenges the objectivity of reality, emphasizing subjective experiences, while Critical Theory critiques and aims to transform oppressive systems. Synthesizing these perspectives unveils their inter-connectedness, offering a holistic understanding of societal dynamics. They not only enrich our comprehension of society but also position us to critically evaluate societal structures and power dynamics, fostering potential social transformations. The enduring relevance and significance of these frameworks in contemporary sociology underscore their instrumental role in shaping research, policy-making, and societal discourse. The integration and adaptation of these theoretical frameworks continue to empower critical analyses and discussions, paving the way for deeper comprehension of societal complexities and fostering advocacy for social justice. These theories serve as guiding lights, illuminating pathways towards transformative change and a more equitable and just society, a testament to our enduring commitment to understanding and fostering a world where justice and equality prevail.

Keywords :
Sociological Theories, Functionalism, Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, Critical Theory, Power Dynamics, Social Structures, Social Justice, Human Behaviour, Societal Dynamics.

–

References :

• Abrutyn, S. (2013). Revisiting institutionalism in sociology: Putting the “institution” back in institutional analysis: Routledge.
• Akinyoade, D. (2013). Theories in peace and conflict research.
• Alexander, J. C., & Colomy, P. (1985). Toward neo-functionalism. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 11-23.
• Allan, K. (2005). Explorations in classical sociological theory: Seeing the social world: Pine Forge Press.
• Allan, K. (2013). The social lens: An invitation to social and sociological theory: Sage Publications.
• Baert, P., & Da Silva, F. C. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond: Polity.
• Ballantine, J., & Hammack, F. M. (2015). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis: Routledge.
• Ballantine, J. H., & Roberts, K. A. (2008). Our social world: Introduction to sociology: Pine forge press.
• Barbalet, J. M. (2001). Emotion, social theory, and social structure: A macrosociological approach: Cambridge University Press.
• Bengtson, V. L., Burgess, E. O., & Parrott, T. M. (1997). Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(2), S72-S88.
• Bernardi, F., González, J. J., & Requena, M. (2007). The sociology of social structure. 21st century sociology: A reference handbook, 1, 162-170.
• Bernstein, R. J. (1986). Structuration as critical theory. Praxis International, 6(2), 235-249.
• Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67-92.
• Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method: Univ of California Press.
• Boltanski, L., Honneth, A., & Celikates, R. (2014). Sociology of Critique or Critical Theory? Luc Boltanski and Axel Honneth in Conversation with Robin Celikates. Translated by Simon Susen.
• Branom, C. (2014). Perspectives of Social Justice in Sociology. Social Justice and Social Work: Rediscovering a Core Value of the Profession, 125-138.
• Brantlinger, E., & Danforth, S. (2006). Critical theory perspective on social class, race, gender, and classroom management.
• Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues, 157-179.
• Brent, E., Brent, E. E., & Lewis, J. S. (2013). Learn sociology: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
• Brickell, C. (2006). The sociological construction of gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review, 54(1), 87-113.
• Browne, C. (2016). Critical social theory: Sage.
• Buechler, S. (2008). What is critical about sociology? Teaching Sociology, 36(4), 318-330.
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2017). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life: Routledge.
• Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation (Vol. 95): Cambridge University Press.
• Callero, P. L. (2003). The sociology of the self. Annual review of sociology, 29(1), 115-133.
• Capper, C. A. (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society.
• Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism.
• Current sociology, 64(6), 931-961.
• Catton Jr, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The american sociologist, 41-49.
• Cetina, K. K., & Cicourel, A. V. (2014). Advances in social theory and methodology (RLE social theory): Toward an integration of micro-and macro-sociologies: Routledge.
• Chang, J. H. Y. (2004). Mead’s theory of emergence as a framework for multilevel sociological inquiry. Symbolic Interaction, 27(3), 405-427.
• Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 4(1), 359-380.
• Chiareli, A. A. (2019a). Applying the” Christian Sociological Re-Imagination” Approach: An Analysis of Illegal Immigration in the US. Journal of Sociology and Christianity, 9(2), 29-54.
• Chiareli, A. A. (2019b). Constructing a” Christian Sociological Re-Imagination:” Creation, Fall, and Redemption as a Unifying Analytical Framework. Journal of Sociology and Christianity, 9(1), 27-47.
• Churton, M., & Brown, A. (2017). Theory and method: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Cicourel, A. V. (1995). The social organization of juvenile justice (Vol. 36): Transaction Publishers.
• Clarke, A. E. (1991). Social worlds/arenas theory as organizational theory. Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, 119.
• Cockerham, W. C. (2007). Social causes of health and disease: Polity.
• Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human relations, 58(11), 1419-1442.
• Conyers, A., & Calhoun, T. C. (2015). The interactionist approach to deviance. The handbook of deviance, 259-276.
• Côté, J.-F. (2019). The past, present, and future of GH Mead in symbolic interactionism: A dialectical encounter around the issue of feminism, power, and society. In The Interaction Order (Vol. 50, pp. 117-140): Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Cronk, G. F. (1973). Symbolic Interactionism: A” Left-Meadian” Interpretation. Social Theory and Practice, 2(3), 313-333.
• Davis, N. J. (1972). Labeling theory in deviance research: A critique and reconsideration. The Sociological Quarterly, 13(4), 447- 474.
• Delaney, T. (2015). Connecting sociology to our lives: An introduction to sociology: Routledge.
• Dennis, A., & Martin, P. J. (2005). Symbolic interactionism and the concept of power. The British journal of sociology, 56(2), 191- 213.
• Denzin, N. K. (2005). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology: A proposed synthesis. Contemporary Sociological Thought, 123.
• Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods: Transaction publishers.
• Doda, Z. (2005). Introduction to sociology. In: Ethiopia pubilic health.
• Doing, S. (2001). Sociological perspectives.
• Dunlap, R. E. (2002). Paradigms, theories, and environmental sociology. Sociological theory and the environment: Classical foundations, contemporary insights, 329-350.
• Eder, K. (1993). The new politics of class: Social movements and cultural dynamics in advanced societies (Vol. 23): Sage.
• Eder, K. (2015). Social movements in social theory. The Oxford handbook of social movements, 31-49.
• Edgley, C. (2003). The dramaturgical genre. Handbook of symbolic interactionism, 140-172.
• Eisenstadt, S. N. (1990). Functional analysis in anthropology and sociology: An interpretative essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 243-260.
• Eisenstadt, S. N. (1995). Power, trust, and meaning: Essays in sociological theory and analysis: University of Chicago Press.
• Estes, C. L., & Edmonds, B. C. (1981). Symbolic interaction and social policy analysis. Symbolic Interaction, 4(1), 75-86.
• Fararo, T. J. (2001). Social action systems: Foundation and synthesis in sociological theory: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Fine, G. A. (1990). Symbolic interactionism in the post-Blumerian age. In Frontiers of social theory. The new syntheses (pp. 117-157): Columbia University Press.
• Fine, G. A. (1993). The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual review of sociology, 19(1), 61-87.
• Fine, G. A. (1995). A second Chicago school?: The development of a postwar American sociology: University of Chicago Press.
• Forte, J. A. (2004). Symbolic interactionism and social work: A forgotten legacy, Part 1. Families in society, 85(3), 391-400.
• Fox, R. C., Lidz, V. M., & Bershady, H. J. (2005). After Parsons: A theory of social action for the twenty-first century: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Fuchs, C. (2006). The self-organization of social movements. Systemic practice and action research, 19, 101-137.
• Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2009). Understanding education: A sociological perspective: Polity.
• Giddens, A., & Griffiths, S. (2006). Sociology: Polity.
• Giroux, H. A. (1980a). Beyond the correspondence theory: Notes on the dynamics of educational reproduction and transformation. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(3), 225-247.
• Giroux, H. A. (1980b). Critical theory and rationality in citizenship education. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(4), 329-366.
• Giroux, H. A. (1982). The politics of educational theory. Social Text(5), 87-107.
• Giroux, H. A., & Robbins, C. G. (2015). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: Toward a critical theory of schooling and pedagogy for the opposition. In Giroux Reader (pp. 3-45): Routledge.
• Giulianotti, R. (2015). Sport: A critical sociology: John Wiley & Sons.
• Godwyn, M., & Gittell, J. H. (2011). Sociology of organizations: Structures and relationships: Sage Publications.
• Görke, A., & Scholl, A. (2006). Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems and journalism research. Journalism studies, 7(4), 644-655.
• Griswold, W. (2012). Cultures and societies in a changing world: Sage.
• Guess, T. J. (2006). The social construction of whiteness: Racism by intent, racism by consequence. Critical Sociology, 32(4), 649-673.
• Gumplowicz, L. (1980). Outlines of sociology: Transaction Publishers.
• Habermas, J. (1987). The tasks of a critical theory of society. In Modern German Sociology (pp. 187-212): Columbia University Press.
• Hall, P. M. (1972). A symbolic interactionist analysis of politics. Sociological Inquiry, 42(3‐4), 35-75.
• Hall, P. M. (2003). Interactionism, social organization, and social processes: Looking back and moving ahead. Symbolic Interaction, 26(1), 33-55.
• Harper, C., & Snowden, M. (2017). Environment and society: Human perspectives on environmental issues: Routledge.
• Hassard, J. (1995). Sociology and organization theory: Positivism, paradigms and postmodernity: Cambridge University Press.
• Heilbroner, R. (2012). A Social Ethics Approach to Social Problems. Walls and Bridges: Social Justice and Public Policy, 1.
• Henry, S., & Milovanovic, D. (1991). Constitutive criminology: The maturation of critical theory. Criminology, 29(2), 293-316.
• Hirsch, M. (2008). The sociology of international economic law: Sociological analysis of the regulation of regional agreements in the world trading system. European Journal of International Law, 19(2), 277-299.
• Hirsch, M. (2018). The Sociological Perspective on International Law. Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper(19-01).
• Howard, J. A. (1994). A social cognitive conception of social structure. Social Psychology Quarterly, 210-227.
• Hurrelmann, K. (1988). Social structure and personality development: The individual as a productive processor of reality: CUP Archive.
• Hustedde, R. J. (2009). Seven theories for seven community developers. An introduction to community development, 20-37.
• Hutchison, E. D. (2003). Dimensions of human behavior: Person and environment (Vol. 1): Sage.
• Hutchison, E. D., Charlesworth, L. W., & Cummings, C. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on human behavior. Hutchison (Ed.), Dimensions of human behavior: Person and environment, 2, 46-88.
• Jackson, M. C. (2007). Systems approaches to management: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Jackson, P. A., & Smith, S. J. (2014). Exploring Social Geography (Routledge Revivals): Routledge.
• Jacobsen, M. H. (2019). Critical and cultural interactionism: Insights from sociology and criminology: Routledge.
• Janowitz, M. (1991). On social organization and social control: University of Chicago Press.
• Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory: University of Chicago Press.
• Johnson, D. P. (2008). Symbolic Interaction: Constructing the Social World–and its Participants’ Identities. Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi-Level Approach, 109-135.
• Jun, J. S. (2012). The social construction of public administration: Interpretive and critical perspectives: State University of New York Press.
• Katovich, M. A., & Reese, W. A. (1993). Postmodern Thought in Symbolic Interaction: Reconstructing Social Inquiry in Light of Late‐Modern Concerns. Sociological Quarterly, 34(3), 391-411.
• Kingsbury, N., & Scanzoni, J. (1993). Structural-functionalism. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach
• (pp. 195-221): Springer.
• Király, G., Pataki, G., Köves, A., & Balázs, B. (2013). Models of (future) society: Bringing social theories back in backcasting.
• Futures, 51, 19-30.
• Lamont, M., & Wuthnow, R. (1990). Betwixt and between: Recent cultural sociology in Europe and the United States. In
• Frontiers of social theory. The new syntheses (pp. 287-315): Columbia University Press.
• Lange, E. (2015). (Re) igniting a sociological imagination in adult education: the continuing relevance of classical theory.
• International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(5), 491-513.
• Layder, D. (2014). Structure, Interaction and Social Theory (RLE Social Theory): Routledge.
• Lemke, J. L. (2005). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics: Taylor & Francis.
• Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the sociological tradition: University of Chicago Press.
• Liu, S. (2015). Law’s social forms: A powerless approach to the sociology of law. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(1), 1-28.
• Livesay, J. (1985). Normative grounding and praxis: Habermas, Giddens, and a contradiction within critical theory. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 66-76.
• Llewellyn, A., Agu, L., & Mercer, D. (2008). Sociology for social workers: Polity.
• Lockie, S. (2004). Collective agency, non-human causality and environmental social movements: a case study of the Australian
• ‘landcare movement’. Journal of sociology, 40(1), 41-57.
• Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power: John Wiley & Sons.
• MacDonald, M. (2001). Finding a critical perspective in grounded theory. Using grounded theory in nursing, 112, 113-158.
• Marshall, V. W., & Bengtson, V. L. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on the sociology of aging. Handbook of sociology of aging, 17- 33.
• Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social forces, 82(4), 1249-1273.
• Matsueda, R. L. (2006). Differential social organization, collective action, and crime. Crime, law and social change, 46, 3-33.
• Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). A symbolic interactionist theory of role-transitions, role-commitments, and delinquency. Developmental theories of crime and delinquency, 44(3), 163-213.
• McNamee, S., & Glasser, M. (1987). The power concept in sociology: A theoretical assessment. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 79-104.
• Merton, R. K. (1996). On social structure and science: University of Chicago Press.
• Michalowski, R. J. (2016). What is crime? Critical Criminology, 24, 181-199.
• Molnar, G., & Kelly, J. (2013). Sport, exercise and social theory: An introduction: Routledge.
• Morris, A., & Herring, C. (1984). Theory and research in social movements: A critical review.
• Morrow, R. A., & Torres, C. A. (1995). Social theory and education: A critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction: State University of New York Press.
• Mouzelis, N. P. (2008). Modern and postmodern social theorizing: Bridging the divide: Cambridge University Press.
• Nalah, A. B., & Ishaya, L. D. (2013). A conceptual overview of deviance and its implication to mental health: a bio psychosocial perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(12), 1-9.
• Neuber, A. (2011). Understanding violence in the ‘society of captives’: Sykes meets Bourdieu in prison. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 50(1), 1-16.
• Nichols, L. T. (2003). Voices of social problems: A dialogical constructionist model. In Studies in Symbolic Interaction (pp. 93- 123): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• O’Donnell, D. (1999). Habermas, critical theory and selves‐directed learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4/5), 251-261.
• Olsson, L., & Jerneck, A. (2018). Social fields and natural systems. Ecology and Society, 23(3).
• Phillipson, C., & Baars, J. (2007). Social theory and social ageing. Ageing in society, 68-84.
• Powell, J. L., & Gilbert, T. (2008). Social theory and emotion: sociological excursions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(9/10), 394-407.
• Prior-Miller, M. (2017). Four major social scientific theories and their value to the public relations researcher. In Public relations theory (pp. 67-81): Routledge.
• Prus, R. (1995). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience: State University of New York Press.
• Prus, R. (1999). Beyond the power mystique: Power as intersubjective accomplishment: State University of New York Press.
• Putney, N. M., Alley, D. E., & Bengtson, V. L. (2005). Social gerontology as public sociology in action. The american sociologist, 36(3-4), 88-104.
• Quist-Adade, C. (2019). Symbolic interactionism: The basics: Vernon Press.
• Reed, M. (2006). 1.1 Organizational theorizing: A historically contested terrain. The Sage handbook of organization studies, 19-54.
• Rigney, D. (2001). The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Risman, B. J. (2018). Gender as a social structure: Springer.
• Ritzer, G. (1990). Micro-macro linkage in sociological theory: Applying a metatheoretical tool. In Frontiers of Social Theory. The New Syntheses (pp. 347-370): Columbia University Press.
• Ritzer, G. (1991). The recent history and the emerging reality of American sociological theory: A metatheoretical interpretation. Paper presented at the Sociological Forum.
• Ritzer, G. (2004). Encyclopedia of social theory: Sage publications.
• Ritzer, G. (2015). Essentials of sociology: Sage Publications.
• Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2010). Contemporary human behavior theory: Pearson.
• Rogers, A. (2013). Human behavior in the social environment: Routledge.
• Roslender, R., & Dillard, J. F. (2003). Reflections on the interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting project. Critical perspectives on accounting, 14(3), 325-351.
• Savelsberg, J. J. (1994). Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 911-943.
• Scambler, G. (2018). Sociology, health and the fractured society: A critical realist account: Routledge.
• Scambler, G., & Scambler, S. (2015). Theorizing health inequalities: The untapped potential of dialectical critical realism. Social Theory & Health, 13, 340-354.
• Schafer, R. B. (1971). Exchange Theory and Symbolic Interaction: An Analysis of Interactionist Perspectives: The Pennsylvania State University.
• Schiff, D. N. (1976). Socio-legal theory: social structure and law. The Modern Law Review, 39(3), 287-310.
• Schur, E. M. (1969). Reactions to deviance: A critical assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 75(3), 309-322.
• Shabani, O. A. P. (2003). Democracy, power and legitimacy: The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas: University of Toronto Press.
• Shalin, D. N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American sociological review, 9-29.
• Sharrock, W., Hughes, J. A., & Martin, P. J. (2003). Understanding modern sociology: Sage.
• Soltanpour, Y., Peri, I., & Temri, L. (2019). Area of protection in S-LCA: human well-being or societal quality. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 2073-2087.
• Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change.
• Social studies of science, 47(5), 703-750.
• Star, S. L. (1996). 13 Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. Cognition and communication at work, 296.
• Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J., Riley, S., & Siemer, W. F. (2012). Sociological considerations in wildlife management. Human dimensions of wildlife management, 58-67.
• Stolley, K. S. (2005). The basics of sociology: Greenwood Press.
• Stout, A. K. (2004). BRINGING SOCIAL MOVEMENTS INTO THE DIALECTIC. Social Problems, Law, and Society, 19.
• Strasser, H. (2014). The normative structure of sociology (RLE Social Theory): Conservative and emancipatory themes in social thought: Routledge.
• Sutherland, J.-A., & Feltey, K. (2012). Cinematic sociology: Social life in film: Sage.
• Swingewood, A. (1999). Sociological theory. Sociology: Issues and Debates, 50-72.
• Teixeira, M. (2017). The sociological roots and deficits of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory, 587-609.
• Thompson, J. B. (1983). Rationality and social rationalization: An assessment of Habermas’s theory of communicative action.
• Sociology, 17(2), 278-294.
• Thompson, M. J. (2016). The domestication of critical theory: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Thompson, W. E., Hickey, J. V., & Thompson, M. L. (2016). Society in focus: An introduction to sociology: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction: Stanford University Press.
• Turner, J. H. (2001). Sociological theory today. In Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 1-17): Springer.
• Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory: Taylor & Francis.
• Turner, J. H. (2008). 21st Century Sociology. In: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Turner, J. H. (2012). Contemporary sociological theory.
• Turner, J. H., & Boyns, D. E. (2001). The return of grand theory. In Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 353-378): Springer.
• Turner, J. H., & Machalek, R. S. (2018). The new evolutionary sociology: Recent and revitalized theoretical and methodological approaches: Routledge.
• Turner, J. H., & Maryanski, A. (1979). Functionalism: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Menlo Park, CA.
• Turner, R. (2017). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives: Routledge.
• Turner, R. H. (1988). Personality in society: Social psychology’s contribution to sociology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1-10.
• Ugwudike, P. (2015). An introduction to critical criminology: Policy Press.
• Ulmer, J. T. (2017). The extensive legacy of symbolic interactionism in criminology. The Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Criminology, 103-122.
• Valentine, C. G., Trautner, M. N., & Spade, J. Z. (2019). The kaleidoscope of gender: Prisms, patterns, and possibilities: Sage Publications.
• Wagner, H. R. (1964). Displacement of scope: A problem of the relationship between small-scale and large-scale sociological theories. American Journal of Sociology, 69(6), 571-584.
• Walter, R. R. (2017). Emancipatory nursing praxis: a theory of social justice in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 40(3), 225- 243.
• Weigert, A. J. (2008). Pragmatic thinking about self, society, and natural environment: Mead, Carson, and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 31(3), 235-258.
• Wexler, P. (2017). Social analysis of education: After the new sociology (Vol. 57): Routledge.
• White, J. M., Martin, T. F., & Adamsons, K. (2018). Family theories: An introduction: Sage Publications.
• Williams, R. H. (2004). The cultural contexts of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. The Blackwell companion to social movements, 91-115.
• Wrong, D. H. (2018). The oversocialized conception of man: Routledge.
• Yar, M. (2012). Critical criminology, critical theory and social harm. New directions in criminological theory, 52-65.
• York, R., & Mancus, P. (2009). Critical human ecology: Historical materialism and natural laws. Sociological Theory, 27(2), 122- 149.
• Zerihun, D. (2005). Introduction to sociology. In: Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER